Essay on Appearance vs Reality in Yellow Wallpaper, Story...

Appearance versus Reality in Yellow Wallpaper, Story of an Hour, and Lottery Authors often write literature to have an emotional impact on the reader. These effects vary from work to work, and they may include happiness, sorrow, anger, or shock. Even authors who try to achieve the same effect may go about it in very different ways. This paper discusses three short stories written to shock the reader, but each uses a different method to achieve its effect. While Kate Chopins The Story of an Hour uses a sudden shift in plot at the end of a short narrative, Shirley Jacksons The Lottery gives hints throughout the story preparing the reader for a shocking ending; in contrast, Charlotte Perkins Gilmans The Yellow Wallpaper†¦show more content†¦She originally thinks her prison room is The most beautiful place! and the bars on the windows are for little children (231); however, two weeks later, she thinks the room is atrocious (232). Her mental state deteriorates rapidly: soon she believes there is a figure in the wallpaper. The narrator later identifies thi s figure as a woman trapped behind the pattern of the wallpaper. Ironically, her husband believes his treatment is helping her; however, when he enters the narrators room at the end of the story, he sees that she has lost nearly all of her sanity: she has torn the wallpaper off the wall to free the imaginary woman trapped behind it. The narrator identifies with her imaginary woman and declares, Ive got out at last in spite of you and Jane. And Ive pulled off most of the paper, so you cant put me back! (242). The final mental state of the narrator in itself is shocking, but it is even more shocking that her husband would lock her inside a room with no human contact and with nothing to do. Most of todays readers are shocked that such a treatment would ever be accepted and implemented, especially by the narrators own husband. Families turn on each other and themselves in Shirley Jacksons 1948 The Lottery, which shocks its readers by showing a town that holds an annual lottery to select a person to stone to death. The story begins on a clear and sunny day withShow MoreRelatedMedia Magic Making Class Invisible2198 Words   |  9 Pagessources which are legitimate and the reader can choose to research it for themselves. Mantsios back himself up by using more than one source to prove his theory about test scores and what class you are in. Whether you choose to believe him or not, the reality is the facts are there, written on the paper right in front of your eyes. He also backs his theory by giving examples of à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã…“some typical lifestyles and some not so typical lifestylesà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‚ , which means he shows you a complete profile of a persons life

The Federalist And The Anti Federalist - 864 Words

In America today there are many political parties which include the Democrats and the Republicans. The beginning of political parties started in 1787 with the federalist, then later on the anti-federalist in 1796. Alexander Hamilton was the leader of the federalist party. Thomas Jefferson was the leader of the anti-federalist; who called themselves the Democratic-Republicans. Our first president, George Washington warned us about having parties and the danger of them. However, not until Congress debated the ratification and implementation of Jay’s Treaty with Great Britain did two political parties clearly emerge; the Federalist and the Anti-Federalist. Today the most influential parties are the Democrats and the Republicans. These parties win all of the presidential elections as of today. Political parties formed because the United States was beginning to grow and expand. Many people had different opinions and so political parties were formed. People were concerned about th e how the new government was going to be organized. In 1787, the Federalist party, which was lead by Alexander Hamilton, was formed. Alexander Hamilton wrote the papers The Federalist and they were published in 1787 and 1788. The papers were about ratifying the constitution of the United States. This party was formed by people who had the same or similar beliefs as Alexander Hamilton. The federalists were individuals who supported a strong national government, diplomatic ties with Great Britain,Show MoreRelatedThe Federalist And Anti Federalist1263 Words   |  6 Pages The Anti-Federalist put up a long and hard fight, however, they were not as organized as the Federalists. While the Anti- Federalist had great concerns about the Constitution and National government, the Federalist had good responses to combat these concerns. The Federalist were and for the Constitution and feel the Article of Confederation were not worth ratifying, these should be scrapped altogether. They felt that the Articles limited the power of congress, because congress had to request cooperationRead MoreThe Federalists And The Anti Federalists1189 Words   |  5 PagesIn debate of the ratification of the Constitution, the Federalists and the Anti- Federalists agreed on several things: the necessity of some form of national government, the preservation of the right to vote, and the need to secure our liberties. The Federalists wanted a strong central government, whereas the Anti- Federalists wanted more power reserved to the state government. The right to vote is important fo r both sides, but they hold conflicting views on the amount of involvement through theRead MoreThe Federalists And The Anti Federalists1656 Words   |  7 Pagesarticles defending their positions. They were named the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists. The Anti-Federalists, however, were incredibly displeased with the name that the Federalists had coined for them. In that time, Federalism was synonymous with Confederation, which was what the Anti-Federalists were fighting to protect. The arguments were varied, and consisted of valid points from both sides. One of the major arguments of the Anti-Federalists was the supposed validity of a large scale republicRead MoreThe Federalists And The Anti Federalists1305 Words   |  6 Pagesthe cause for a huge debate between; The Federalists and the Anti-Federalists. The Federalists were those who thought that there should be a new Union created with a strong centralized government and individual regional governments. They felt that it wa s not necessary for there to be a bill of rights because it was implied that those rights the Constitution did not specifically state would be handed down to the states. On the other hand, the Anti-Federalists were opposed to such a form of governmentRead MoreFederalists Vs. Anti Federalists1518 Words   |  7 PagesIn early 1788, Federalists and Anti-Federalists held fierce debates over how the state of Rhode Island would vote on Constitutional ratification. Two models of democracy were contested: the Anti-Federalists argued in favor of mass participation in the form of a state referendum, and the Federalists argued in favor of elite representation in the form of a state convention. On the whole, while the state referendum model used in the debates in Rhode Island allows for greater participation and an opportunityRead MoreFederalists vs. Anti-Federalists1723 Words   |  7 Pagesthe subject of numerous debates. The contending groups consisted of Federalists, those who supported ratification, and Anti-Federalists, those opposed to the constitution. Each group published a series of letters known as the Federalist and Anti-Federalist Papers. The Anti-Federalist papers objected to provisions of the proposed constitution while the Federalist Papers defended the rationale behind the document. Anti-Federalist objections included that; the United States was too extensive to beRead More Federalists and Anti-Federalists Essay1665 Words   |  7 PagesThe Constitution, when first introduced, set the stage for much controversy in the United States. The two major parties in this battle were the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists. The Federalists, such as James Madison, were in favor of ratifying the Constitution. On the other hand, the Anti-Federalists, such as Patrick Henry and Richard Henry Lee, were against ratification. Each party has their own beliefs on why or why not this document should or should not be passed. These beliefs are displayedRead MoreTh e Federalists Vs. Anti Federalists1010 Words   |  5 Pagesduring the American Revolution. The rivalry between the Federalists and the anti-Federalists emerged during the process of ratifying the Constitution between 1787 and 1788. Initially, the Federalists supported the Constitution while the anti-Federalists did not (199). The principle differences dividing the Federalists and anti-Federalists were the controversy of creating a federal government and how to interpret the Constitution. Anti-Federalists insisted on protecting the rights of the states and theRead MoreAnti Federalists Vs. Federalists1634 Words   |  7 Pages Anti Federalists vs. Federalists (Paper #1) The Federalists and the Anti - Federalists played an indispensable part in the establishment of the American Constitution. Federalists were supporters of the constitution, while Anti federalist were against the ratification of the Constitution. Federalists believed in the idea of a larger heterogeneous republic whereas anti federalists wanted a small homogenous republic. Famous federalists like James Madison, John Jay and Alexander Hamilton are responsibleRead MoreThe Federalists Vs. The Anti Federalists1801 Words   |  8 Pagesare worse than others. In the case of the Federalists vs. The Anti-Federalists, was the drafting of the Constitution actually worth it in the end? When the colonists first came over seas from Great Britain there was one thing that was vastly agreed on—a change in how government works and runs was necessary for the future of America. Two major groups eventually formed behind this way of thinking, the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists. The Federa lists were under the impression that the formation

The Ball Poem Free Essays

Ferryman writes in his poem about depression and sadness. He uses the little boy and the ball to compare to a situation that most of us readers have experienced. The poem isn’t given any specific setting; rather it has very little subjects and objects that leave us, the readers, with a wide imagination. We will write a custom essay sample on The Ball Poem or any similar topic only for you Order Now Ferryman uses Symbolism in his poem by writing, â€Å"People will take balls, Balls will be lost always, little boy. † He is comparing the ball to some sort of irretrievable loss that he has experienced. The anguish and agony of losing something so dear to a boy is tough. Being a child, our toys are what we are most important to us. Ferryman knows the relationship between children and their toys and uses it in such ways to explicate the sorrow that this young boy is feeling. Ferryman expresses so much emotion In this poem that it’s almost difficult not to feel what this young boy is feeling. â€Å"What Is the boy now, who has lost his ball,† is how the poem begins, therefore, giving Off sense of mourning and gloom. We get this visual Image that the ball is gone, and that he boy is indefinitely saddened. Because who wouldn’t be, by losing anything closest to us. Ferryman uses Imagery by saying, â€Å"l saw It go merrily bouncing, down the street, and then merrily over-?there It Is In the water! † At this point, we see that he set us up for disappointment. We knew that the ball was gone, but now It’s clear to where It Is. Lost forever. Throughout, â€Å"The Ball Poem,† Ferryman Is talking about a boy, but at first it isn’t known exactly who this boy might be. But at the end of the poem he uses Persona by saying, â€Å"l suffer and move, my mind and my heart move†¦ With all that move me, under the water†¦ Or whistling, I am not a little boy. † All of this pain, grief, and sorrow happen to be all about him. He’s stating that this boy Is Indeed a reflection of him and his life. John Ferryman experiences, â€Å"the epistemology of loss. † Lonely and Isolated, he has been through a deep and dark time. Through literally elements, Ferryman expresses himself In very Intense and dramatic ways. â€Å"The Ball Poem† gave great examples of mysterious losses but losses that all of us can compare to, whether It’s a ball or something more. We all have things we cherish, and we all either have or will suffer a loss. The Ball Poem By Tameness the sorrow that this young boy is feeling. Ferryman expresses so much emotion in this poem that it’s almost difficult not to feel what this young boy is feeling. â€Å"What is sense of mourning and gloom. We get this visual image that the ball is gone, and that to us. Ferryman uses imagery by saying, â€Å"l saw it go merrily bouncing, down the street, and then merrily over-?there it is in the water! † At this point, we see that he set us up for disappointment. We knew that the ball was gone, but now it’s clear to where it is. Lost forever. Throughout, â€Å"The Ball Poem,† Ferryman is talking about a pain, grief, and sorrow happen to be all about him. He’s stating that this boy is indeed a reflection of him and his life. John Ferryman experiences, â€Å"the epistemology of loss. † Lonely and isolated, he has been through a deep and dark time. Through literally elements, Ferryman expresses himself in very intense and dramatic ways. Compare to, whether it’s a ball or something more. We all have things we cherish, and How to cite The Ball Poem, Papers

Cold War Ideologies or Insecurity free essay sample

The origins of the Cold War were less about ideologies and more about concerns over insecurity. ’ Discuss. The origins of the cold war were entrenched in both American and Soviet concern over insecurity, and the outbreak of cold war was a process that began towards the end of the Second World War. However, both nations emerged as superpowers after the Second World War, and both shed their policies of isolationism-with the power to influence the global sphere, there is little doubt that there would be conflict of ideology between the nations as well. Ultimately, the conflict between USA and USSR would always stem from the fact that they were fundamentally different, and their ideologies were mutually exclusive. Conflicting ideologies was often thought to be the origin of the Cold War. USA strongly believed in democracy and the system of the free market. People were allowed to vote for leaders and freedom of speech and media were allowed. We will write a custom essay sample on Cold War: Ideologies or Insecurity? or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page USSR, on the other hand, believed in communism and a one- party rule. They operated under a command economy, where the country’s wealth was owned collectively. The democrats believed that communism was a form of slavery to the government, while the communists believed that people in democratic countries were slaves to the rich. When the two countries with clashing ideologies became superpowers, conflict was inevitable as they tried to spread their ideologies to the rest of the world. The clash of USSR’s belief in communism versus USA’s democracy can be traced back to the 1917 civil war in Russia. The West gave support to the whites by supplying them with weapons and capital. Even in the period before WWII, USSR had tried to court the friendship of USA and the West, but the west rebuffed such attempts, allowing Germany to rearm, all in the hope that Hitler (who was strongly against communism) would invade the USSR and stamp out the communist regime once and for all. The Nazi- Soviet pact was thus the USSR turning the tables on USA and the West, supporting Hitler’s plans of crushing the democratic states and implementing his fascist regime across Europe. Ideologies thus played a big part in the conflict between USSR and USA- both were so against the other’s ideologies that they were willing to work with Hitler to see the other side get crushed. Towards the end of WWII, Germany’s defeat was certain, and USA and USSR no longer had a common enemy to link them together. Both of them clashed over what to do with Germany, leading to disagreements at the Potsdam conference. The West needed USSR to ree Asia- Pacific from Japanese occupation, but the development of the atom bomb (of which the USSR were unaware about) meant that an alliance between them no longer needed to be maintained. This led to a direct confrontation between the two ideologies. However, concerns over insecurity were prominent on both sides and was also thought to be an origin of the Cold War. Stalin’s insecurity stemmed from the fact that he had been through the attacks by the democratic US twice- first in the 1917 Bolshevik revolution, and the second time before WWII when US and the West had allowed Hitler to rearm. Stalin’s insecurity was therefore derived from the fear that too many countries in Europe would become ruled by democracy and capitalism and the USA would once again try to crush communist rule. The US did not inform Stalin that they had the atomic bomb, and the release of the bombs on Nagasaki and Hiroshima was interpreted as an act of threat from the USA to Stalin, warning them that they had- in Truman’s words- ‘a bomb of exceptional power’. The USA further added to Soviet insecurity by making every effort to retain nuclear monopoly through the Baruch Plan, and also by ending Lend Lease in 1945, thus crippling USSR’s damaged economy even further. Their insistence on a Wilsonian Europe and apparent endorsement of Churchill’s Iron curtain speech made it seem like they were forcefully imposing their democratic ideals onto the rest of Europe. Stalin’s insecurities, already developed by USA’s attempts at crushing communism before WWII, were only fuelled by these factors. His desire to seek security was therefore understandable, but he did so in a way that sparked suspicion in the USA instead, perpetuating tensions between the two countries. Stalin equated territory with security, and his implementation of salami tactics was successful in creating an Eastern Europe buffer zone of satellite states, with communist governments set up in states around USSR, all loyal to the Moscow government. Stalin’s concerns over insecurity thus drove him to divide Europe into two spheres of influence, which was exactly what piqued USA’s insecurity. USA believed that it was due to the division of fascist, democratic and communist ideology in Europe that caused WWII, and it was also due to the policy of appeasement from Britain and France towards Germany that allowed Hitler to claim such a large portion of territory. The USA saw Stalin’s usage of salami tactics- the systematic conversion of Eastern European states to communism- as a repeat of what happened with Hitler pre WWII. The USA thus acted on their concerns over insecurity by implementing the Truman doctrine and the Marshall Plan- their ‘containment policy’, where they used any means short of war to contain communism within its borders. Stalin called the Marshall Plan an act of ‘dollar imperialism’ and believed it was an attempt to spread democracy and capitalism through money. Ironically, Stalin’s concerns over insecurity was caused by the US, and his response to that insecurity was what caused USA’s own concerns over insecurity, and their response to that insecurity via the TD and MP only further fuelled the USSR’s insecurity- and thus both ends were trapped in a vicious cycle which only led to heightened tensions and conflict. In conclusion, although both ideologies and concerns over insecurity were thought to be origins of cold war, it was more ideologies than concerns over insecurity that was the origin of the cold war. The concerns over insecurity could be explained by the fact that, fundamentally, the USA and USSR were very different. From the civil war in 1917, it was clear that democracy has been opposed to communism, and the communist’s internationalist ideals was what struck fear in the hearts of the democrats, who sought to convert Europe into a democratic continent because of their firm belief that if the nations prospered, there would be less chances of war. Concerns over insecurity was therefore an underlying factor of the fact that the ideologies of the two nations were mutually exclusive- more countries under communist rule meant a spread of communism, which was unacceptable to USA, and more democratic countries was an act of dollar imperialism, which was unacceptable to USSR. The origins of the cold war was therefore more of ideologies than concerns over insecurity.