Gender Inequality and the Human Future :: Equality Feminist Feminism Essays

Gender Inequality and the Human Future On Tuesday March 26th, Allan Johnson gave a lecture, "Unraveling the Gender Knot: Communities, Nature, and the Human Future." Johnson describes himself as being neither pessimistic or optimistic on the subject of the human future on the earth. He mentioned a quote, "We are of no more value than the simplest bacteria" and said that other species will not miss us when and if we’re gone. He attributes this to the general human disregard for the environment. This disregard has some relationship to gender inequality which stems from the patriarchal qualities of our society, since nature is viewed as feminine and as something that men can control. Johnson says that there are four characteristics of patriarchy that are embedded in the social fabric of our society as well as in that of many other societies. The first characteristic is that there is a male dominated social system. This does not mean that all men are powerful or that all women are powerless but rather that where someone has power it tends to be a male. The second characteristic of patriarchy is that such a society is organized around an obsession for control, which is used to elevate men. Johnson mentioned a belief that was widespread during the 19th century even throughout prestigious colleges. This belief was that women should not attend college because doing so would result in the diversion of blood from uterine function and cause them to run a muck. The third characteristic is that patriarchies are male identified. This means that male experience is taken as the experience for human beings. Some examples of this that Johnson mentioned are the word mankind and the use of the word guys when referring to a group that includes women. Members of many societies prefer to have male children, mostly for economic reasons. In India, amniocentesis is used to select males, since they have greater earning potential and do not result in the paying of a dowry. In China, there are "millions of missing girls in the age pyramid." Although male preference isn’t as extreme in the United States, it does exist. This is demonstrated by what Johnson mentioned about unmarried couples being twice as likely to keep a baby if it is a male. The fourth characteristic of patriarchies is that they are male centered which is evident from the movies that Hollywood produces. Johnson says that "the path of least resistance is to pay attention to what males do. Gender Inequality and the Human Future :: Equality Feminist Feminism Essays Gender Inequality and the Human Future On Tuesday March 26th, Allan Johnson gave a lecture, "Unraveling the Gender Knot: Communities, Nature, and the Human Future." Johnson describes himself as being neither pessimistic or optimistic on the subject of the human future on the earth. He mentioned a quote, "We are of no more value than the simplest bacteria" and said that other species will not miss us when and if we’re gone. He attributes this to the general human disregard for the environment. This disregard has some relationship to gender inequality which stems from the patriarchal qualities of our society, since nature is viewed as feminine and as something that men can control. Johnson says that there are four characteristics of patriarchy that are embedded in the social fabric of our society as well as in that of many other societies. The first characteristic is that there is a male dominated social system. This does not mean that all men are powerful or that all women are powerless but rather that where someone has power it tends to be a male. The second characteristic of patriarchy is that such a society is organized around an obsession for control, which is used to elevate men. Johnson mentioned a belief that was widespread during the 19th century even throughout prestigious colleges. This belief was that women should not attend college because doing so would result in the diversion of blood from uterine function and cause them to run a muck. The third characteristic is that patriarchies are male identified. This means that male experience is taken as the experience for human beings. Some examples of this that Johnson mentioned are the word mankind and the use of the word guys when referring to a group that includes women. Members of many societies prefer to have male children, mostly for economic reasons. In India, amniocentesis is used to select males, since they have greater earning potential and do not result in the paying of a dowry. In China, there are "millions of missing girls in the age pyramid." Although male preference isn’t as extreme in the United States, it does exist. This is demonstrated by what Johnson mentioned about unmarried couples being twice as likely to keep a baby if it is a male. The fourth characteristic of patriarchies is that they are male centered which is evident from the movies that Hollywood produces. Johnson says that "the path of least resistance is to pay attention to what males do.

Ethical and Legal Issue Essay

How personal and societal values can influence ethical decision- making process when nurses are faced with ethical issues, nursing has long advocated a nonjudgmental approach to care. Nurses need to able to apply ethical principle in decision- making and consider their own values and belief and the values and belief of the client. As nurses we have the responsibility to protect the right of the client by acting as client advocate. According with Blais, Hayes, Kozier and Erb (2006) values are freely chosen, enduring belief or attitudes about the worth of a person, object, idea, or action. Freedom, courage, family, and dignity are example of values. Blais it al (2006) stated that values frequently derive from a person’s cultural, ethic, and religious background; from societal tradition; and from the values held by peer group and family. In the malpractice case, she faced with an ethical-legal conflict; ethical and legal conflicts are not synonymous. There are times in professional practice when the legal requirement does not appear compatible with ethical approach. Nurses may place themselves in legal jeopardy when they opt for what they see as the ethical or â€Å"right† thing to do, in spite of what is inherent in the law as that apply. In this case the nurse has acted as a client advocate and notify to the admintration about the situation she was witnessed. She may be was influenced by societal values, of human life and individual right. In Marianne case we as nurse have to respect family decision but at the same time patient values by been advocate by remind them to keep in mind what would has Marianne wishes.

The Effects Of Social Media On Our Lives - 900 Words

There are so many things that go on in this world, with this in mind think about how everyone gets their information; Media. The world is surrounded by people walking in the streets on their phones, sitting at a restaurant on their phones, even at work on their phones, do you see the problem? There are so many things that happen on a daily basis, but there are only a few people that can go thought the day without their phones. Phones are the next generation baby sitters. With news at our fingertips the speed at which news gets around is so shocking. Social media is how people get their information and strive through the day, but when is it too much. From the invention of a cell phone to now, there have been so many advances. With the new technology advance, there comes the people that have to have the best of the best, which increases the amount of time one is on their phone. With news giving people facts and the truth with a little bit of bias, there is a point that they are trying to get out. Then on the other side to that you have the mass media that alters the truth which has a lot of people that influence the facts. The media is a huge way for people to communicate and when they do they things they say are written and can be altered which in some cases is not the best. With there being so many different types of apps and what not there are tons of places for people to get information, sometimes the information that they are getting is false accusation, but technologyShow MoreRelatedSocial Media And Its Effects On Our Lives1200 Words   |  5 PagesEver since World Wide Web came out in 1990, it has opened a floodgate for sharing and communicating over the internet in the form of social media. People can keep in touch with their friends and families from across the world, know what they are up to, and see all the interesting things that goes on in their lives. Keeping up with everyone and everything no longer requires tedious phone calls and email messages . Instead, we have easier, better looking, more interactive, and all around more fun waysRead MoreThe Effects Of Social Media On Our Lives1608 Words   |  7 Pagescommunication has been an important factor in our lives. This was the only source of communication for a long period of time. Over time, we developed new ways of communicating with each other such as emailing and talking on the phone. Human beings have become so reliant on the use of electronic devices to communicate. Although this is a good way to keep in touch with friends, it can become a serious problem to many individuals. The growth of social media sites began to grow in the year 2003, whichRead MoreThe Effects Of Social Media On Our Lives1563 Words   |  7 Pages Blink This day and age we call social is far from it. People are becoming slaves to their devices, living their life through a screen. We find self worth through how many â€Å"likes† we got on our picture, or how many â€Å"friends† on our Facebook page. Social media has created a generation of smart phones and dumb people. Where staying connected, is more important than creating connections with others. Where we would rather stare at our friend list while waiting for the bus than simply striking upRead MoreThe Effects Of Social Media On Our Lives2017 Words   |  9 PagesSocial Media as well as texting plays an important role in our day to day life. Many say a negative impact on our life. Just about everywhere, there will be somebody on their mobile device either communicating with someone or playing Angry Birds. Most People in this day and age own a cell phone. For the people owning cellphones, they are more likely to be less social because they spend on average one hour and forty minutes on social media alone. Social media is decreasing the in skill communicationsRead MoreThe Effects Of Social Media On Our Lives1940 Words   |  8 PagesWith the use of social media being the main way we communicate in today s society, it has become a worldwide phenomenon with people around the world using this platform as a way of communication. Have you ever thought about how social media could be affecting your life? Does it affect it in a negative or positive way? Most people don’t see how social media can be affecting their daily life. It s more than just logging onto Facebook, Instagram,Tumblr or Twitter to get your daily updates on someRead MoreSocial Media And Its Effects On Our Lives Essay852 Words   |  4 Pagescommunication such as proxemics, chronemics, paralanguage and haptics. The way in which we use space, body language, tone and time do indeed, communicate something in one way or another. Communication is not only evolved by our words. Fur thering this recognition, social media sites like Facebook, Twitter, Instagram and more lack a majority of these communication components. On a deeper level, interpersonal communication also revolves around these same components. So, if these components are lostRead MoreSocial Media And Its Effects On Our Lives865 Words   |  4 Pagesexperience, social interaction online it helps me to keep in touch with families, friends and also for networking, but in general my post is more likely about my family , â€Å"Selfies† or just simple funny post that I may like. In particular, social media allows me to have easy communication access with significant other that are out of the country. Many of Us for the most part has been affected by social media in their daily person to person interaction now days, the texting, email and media account likeRead MoreThe Effects Of Social Media On Our Lives918 Words   |  4 Pagesin anything in the world you want. Whether, you want to work from home, talk to your family and friends. The greatest thing in the world is that Social Media is at your bedside, friends at your bedside how great is that. When Facebook, Twitter, Instagram etc, began did you think that there would be a limit to friendships? No, constant use of social media has become the normal. People are making friends, lots of friends every day. Robin Dunbar say there is a Limit of Friendship, she compares herRead MoreSocial Media And Its Effect On Our Daily Lives1121 Words   |  5 Pagesof many competitive media cleavages, where their ideas can be rewarded by a corrupt editorial board. The practice of seeking resources that validate existing beliefs is by no means a new phenomenon, but social media further enables a participant to intentionally narrow their minds. The infectious and demanding nature of social media prompted this analysis of its effect on our news consumption. The search for amusement and truth in our daily lives is easily transmitted to our virtual persona, anRead MoreThe Effects Of Social Media On Our Lives Today1953 Words   |  8 Pagesbecause of the advent of social media. Rather, social media did not invent the transmission of these messages, but it has made their transmission easier and more immediate than ever. The cell phones we carry in our pockets today are more powerful and versatile than the computers, cameras, tape recorders, and library books combined of twenty years ago. With all of this power, however, comes the great effect of social media on our lives today. Given the examples above, those effects include: gratitude,

Essay on Appearance vs Reality in Yellow Wallpaper, Story...

Appearance versus Reality in Yellow Wallpaper, Story of an Hour, and Lottery Authors often write literature to have an emotional impact on the reader. These effects vary from work to work, and they may include happiness, sorrow, anger, or shock. Even authors who try to achieve the same effect may go about it in very different ways. This paper discusses three short stories written to shock the reader, but each uses a different method to achieve its effect. While Kate Chopins The Story of an Hour uses a sudden shift in plot at the end of a short narrative, Shirley Jacksons The Lottery gives hints throughout the story preparing the reader for a shocking ending; in contrast, Charlotte Perkins Gilmans The Yellow Wallpaper†¦show more content†¦She originally thinks her prison room is The most beautiful place! and the bars on the windows are for little children (231); however, two weeks later, she thinks the room is atrocious (232). Her mental state deteriorates rapidly: soon she believes there is a figure in the wallpaper. The narrator later identifies thi s figure as a woman trapped behind the pattern of the wallpaper. Ironically, her husband believes his treatment is helping her; however, when he enters the narrators room at the end of the story, he sees that she has lost nearly all of her sanity: she has torn the wallpaper off the wall to free the imaginary woman trapped behind it. The narrator identifies with her imaginary woman and declares, Ive got out at last in spite of you and Jane. And Ive pulled off most of the paper, so you cant put me back! (242). The final mental state of the narrator in itself is shocking, but it is even more shocking that her husband would lock her inside a room with no human contact and with nothing to do. Most of todays readers are shocked that such a treatment would ever be accepted and implemented, especially by the narrators own husband. Families turn on each other and themselves in Shirley Jacksons 1948 The Lottery, which shocks its readers by showing a town that holds an annual lottery to select a person to stone to death. The story begins on a clear and sunny day withShow MoreRelatedMedia Magic Making Class Invisible2198 Words   |  9 Pagessources which are legitimate and the reader can choose to research it for themselves. Mantsios back himself up by using more than one source to prove his theory about test scores and what class you are in. Whether you choose to believe him or not, the reality is the facts are there, written on the paper right in front of your eyes. He also backs his theory by giving examples of à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã…“some typical lifestyles and some not so typical lifestylesà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‚ , which means he shows you a complete profile of a persons life

The Federalist And The Anti Federalist - 864 Words

In America today there are many political parties which include the Democrats and the Republicans. The beginning of political parties started in 1787 with the federalist, then later on the anti-federalist in 1796. Alexander Hamilton was the leader of the federalist party. Thomas Jefferson was the leader of the anti-federalist; who called themselves the Democratic-Republicans. Our first president, George Washington warned us about having parties and the danger of them. However, not until Congress debated the ratification and implementation of Jay’s Treaty with Great Britain did two political parties clearly emerge; the Federalist and the Anti-Federalist. Today the most influential parties are the Democrats and the Republicans. These parties win all of the presidential elections as of today. Political parties formed because the United States was beginning to grow and expand. Many people had different opinions and so political parties were formed. People were concerned about th e how the new government was going to be organized. In 1787, the Federalist party, which was lead by Alexander Hamilton, was formed. Alexander Hamilton wrote the papers The Federalist and they were published in 1787 and 1788. The papers were about ratifying the constitution of the United States. This party was formed by people who had the same or similar beliefs as Alexander Hamilton. The federalists were individuals who supported a strong national government, diplomatic ties with Great Britain,Show MoreRelatedThe Federalist And Anti Federalist1263 Words   |  6 Pages The Anti-Federalist put up a long and hard fight, however, they were not as organized as the Federalists. While the Anti- Federalist had great concerns about the Constitution and National government, the Federalist had good responses to combat these concerns. The Federalist were and for the Constitution and feel the Article of Confederation were not worth ratifying, these should be scrapped altogether. They felt that the Articles limited the power of congress, because congress had to request cooperationRead MoreThe Federalists And The Anti Federalists1189 Words   |  5 PagesIn debate of the ratification of the Constitution, the Federalists and the Anti- Federalists agreed on several things: the necessity of some form of national government, the preservation of the right to vote, and the need to secure our liberties. The Federalists wanted a strong central government, whereas the Anti- Federalists wanted more power reserved to the state government. The right to vote is important fo r both sides, but they hold conflicting views on the amount of involvement through theRead MoreThe Federalists And The Anti Federalists1656 Words   |  7 Pagesarticles defending their positions. They were named the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists. The Anti-Federalists, however, were incredibly displeased with the name that the Federalists had coined for them. In that time, Federalism was synonymous with Confederation, which was what the Anti-Federalists were fighting to protect. The arguments were varied, and consisted of valid points from both sides. One of the major arguments of the Anti-Federalists was the supposed validity of a large scale republicRead MoreThe Federalists And The Anti Federalists1305 Words   |  6 Pagesthe cause for a huge debate between; The Federalists and the Anti-Federalists. The Federalists were those who thought that there should be a new Union created with a strong centralized government and individual regional governments. They felt that it wa s not necessary for there to be a bill of rights because it was implied that those rights the Constitution did not specifically state would be handed down to the states. On the other hand, the Anti-Federalists were opposed to such a form of governmentRead MoreFederalists Vs. Anti Federalists1518 Words   |  7 PagesIn early 1788, Federalists and Anti-Federalists held fierce debates over how the state of Rhode Island would vote on Constitutional ratification. Two models of democracy were contested: the Anti-Federalists argued in favor of mass participation in the form of a state referendum, and the Federalists argued in favor of elite representation in the form of a state convention. On the whole, while the state referendum model used in the debates in Rhode Island allows for greater participation and an opportunityRead MoreFederalists vs. Anti-Federalists1723 Words   |  7 Pagesthe subject of numerous debates. The contending groups consisted of Federalists, those who supported ratification, and Anti-Federalists, those opposed to the constitution. Each group published a series of letters known as the Federalist and Anti-Federalist Papers. The Anti-Federalist papers objected to provisions of the proposed constitution while the Federalist Papers defended the rationale behind the document. Anti-Federalist objections included that; the United States was too extensive to beRead More Federalists and Anti-Federalists Essay1665 Words   |  7 PagesThe Constitution, when first introduced, set the stage for much controversy in the United States. The two major parties in this battle were the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists. The Federalists, such as James Madison, were in favor of ratifying the Constitution. On the other hand, the Anti-Federalists, such as Patrick Henry and Richard Henry Lee, were against ratification. Each party has their own beliefs on why or why not this document should or should not be passed. These beliefs are displayedRead MoreTh e Federalists Vs. Anti Federalists1010 Words   |  5 Pagesduring the American Revolution. The rivalry between the Federalists and the anti-Federalists emerged during the process of ratifying the Constitution between 1787 and 1788. Initially, the Federalists supported the Constitution while the anti-Federalists did not (199). The principle differences dividing the Federalists and anti-Federalists were the controversy of creating a federal government and how to interpret the Constitution. Anti-Federalists insisted on protecting the rights of the states and theRead MoreAnti Federalists Vs. Federalists1634 Words   |  7 Pages Anti Federalists vs. Federalists (Paper #1) The Federalists and the Anti - Federalists played an indispensable part in the establishment of the American Constitution. Federalists were supporters of the constitution, while Anti federalist were against the ratification of the Constitution. Federalists believed in the idea of a larger heterogeneous republic whereas anti federalists wanted a small homogenous republic. Famous federalists like James Madison, John Jay and Alexander Hamilton are responsibleRead MoreThe Federalists Vs. The Anti Federalists1801 Words   |  8 Pagesare worse than others. In the case of the Federalists vs. The Anti-Federalists, was the drafting of the Constitution actually worth it in the end? When the colonists first came over seas from Great Britain there was one thing that was vastly agreed on—a change in how government works and runs was necessary for the future of America. Two major groups eventually formed behind this way of thinking, the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists. The Federa lists were under the impression that the formation

The Ball Poem Free Essays

Ferryman writes in his poem about depression and sadness. He uses the little boy and the ball to compare to a situation that most of us readers have experienced. The poem isn’t given any specific setting; rather it has very little subjects and objects that leave us, the readers, with a wide imagination. We will write a custom essay sample on The Ball Poem or any similar topic only for you Order Now Ferryman uses Symbolism in his poem by writing, â€Å"People will take balls, Balls will be lost always, little boy. † He is comparing the ball to some sort of irretrievable loss that he has experienced. The anguish and agony of losing something so dear to a boy is tough. Being a child, our toys are what we are most important to us. Ferryman knows the relationship between children and their toys and uses it in such ways to explicate the sorrow that this young boy is feeling. Ferryman expresses so much emotion In this poem that it’s almost difficult not to feel what this young boy is feeling. â€Å"What Is the boy now, who has lost his ball,† is how the poem begins, therefore, giving Off sense of mourning and gloom. We get this visual Image that the ball is gone, and that he boy is indefinitely saddened. Because who wouldn’t be, by losing anything closest to us. Ferryman uses Imagery by saying, â€Å"l saw It go merrily bouncing, down the street, and then merrily over-?there It Is In the water! † At this point, we see that he set us up for disappointment. We knew that the ball was gone, but now It’s clear to where It Is. Lost forever. Throughout, â€Å"The Ball Poem,† Ferryman Is talking about a boy, but at first it isn’t known exactly who this boy might be. But at the end of the poem he uses Persona by saying, â€Å"l suffer and move, my mind and my heart move†¦ With all that move me, under the water†¦ Or whistling, I am not a little boy. † All of this pain, grief, and sorrow happen to be all about him. He’s stating that this boy Is Indeed a reflection of him and his life. John Ferryman experiences, â€Å"the epistemology of loss. † Lonely and Isolated, he has been through a deep and dark time. Through literally elements, Ferryman expresses himself In very Intense and dramatic ways. â€Å"The Ball Poem† gave great examples of mysterious losses but losses that all of us can compare to, whether It’s a ball or something more. We all have things we cherish, and we all either have or will suffer a loss. The Ball Poem By Tameness the sorrow that this young boy is feeling. Ferryman expresses so much emotion in this poem that it’s almost difficult not to feel what this young boy is feeling. â€Å"What is sense of mourning and gloom. We get this visual image that the ball is gone, and that to us. Ferryman uses imagery by saying, â€Å"l saw it go merrily bouncing, down the street, and then merrily over-?there it is in the water! † At this point, we see that he set us up for disappointment. We knew that the ball was gone, but now it’s clear to where it is. Lost forever. Throughout, â€Å"The Ball Poem,† Ferryman is talking about a pain, grief, and sorrow happen to be all about him. He’s stating that this boy is indeed a reflection of him and his life. John Ferryman experiences, â€Å"the epistemology of loss. † Lonely and isolated, he has been through a deep and dark time. Through literally elements, Ferryman expresses himself in very intense and dramatic ways. Compare to, whether it’s a ball or something more. We all have things we cherish, and How to cite The Ball Poem, Papers

Cold War Ideologies or Insecurity free essay sample

The origins of the Cold War were less about ideologies and more about concerns over insecurity. ’ Discuss. The origins of the cold war were entrenched in both American and Soviet concern over insecurity, and the outbreak of cold war was a process that began towards the end of the Second World War. However, both nations emerged as superpowers after the Second World War, and both shed their policies of isolationism-with the power to influence the global sphere, there is little doubt that there would be conflict of ideology between the nations as well. Ultimately, the conflict between USA and USSR would always stem from the fact that they were fundamentally different, and their ideologies were mutually exclusive. Conflicting ideologies was often thought to be the origin of the Cold War. USA strongly believed in democracy and the system of the free market. People were allowed to vote for leaders and freedom of speech and media were allowed. We will write a custom essay sample on Cold War: Ideologies or Insecurity? or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page USSR, on the other hand, believed in communism and a one- party rule. They operated under a command economy, where the country’s wealth was owned collectively. The democrats believed that communism was a form of slavery to the government, while the communists believed that people in democratic countries were slaves to the rich. When the two countries with clashing ideologies became superpowers, conflict was inevitable as they tried to spread their ideologies to the rest of the world. The clash of USSR’s belief in communism versus USA’s democracy can be traced back to the 1917 civil war in Russia. The West gave support to the whites by supplying them with weapons and capital. Even in the period before WWII, USSR had tried to court the friendship of USA and the West, but the west rebuffed such attempts, allowing Germany to rearm, all in the hope that Hitler (who was strongly against communism) would invade the USSR and stamp out the communist regime once and for all. The Nazi- Soviet pact was thus the USSR turning the tables on USA and the West, supporting Hitler’s plans of crushing the democratic states and implementing his fascist regime across Europe. Ideologies thus played a big part in the conflict between USSR and USA- both were so against the other’s ideologies that they were willing to work with Hitler to see the other side get crushed. Towards the end of WWII, Germany’s defeat was certain, and USA and USSR no longer had a common enemy to link them together. Both of them clashed over what to do with Germany, leading to disagreements at the Potsdam conference. The West needed USSR to ree Asia- Pacific from Japanese occupation, but the development of the atom bomb (of which the USSR were unaware about) meant that an alliance between them no longer needed to be maintained. This led to a direct confrontation between the two ideologies. However, concerns over insecurity were prominent on both sides and was also thought to be an origin of the Cold War. Stalin’s insecurity stemmed from the fact that he had been through the attacks by the democratic US twice- first in the 1917 Bolshevik revolution, and the second time before WWII when US and the West had allowed Hitler to rearm. Stalin’s insecurity was therefore derived from the fear that too many countries in Europe would become ruled by democracy and capitalism and the USA would once again try to crush communist rule. The US did not inform Stalin that they had the atomic bomb, and the release of the bombs on Nagasaki and Hiroshima was interpreted as an act of threat from the USA to Stalin, warning them that they had- in Truman’s words- ‘a bomb of exceptional power’. The USA further added to Soviet insecurity by making every effort to retain nuclear monopoly through the Baruch Plan, and also by ending Lend Lease in 1945, thus crippling USSR’s damaged economy even further. Their insistence on a Wilsonian Europe and apparent endorsement of Churchill’s Iron curtain speech made it seem like they were forcefully imposing their democratic ideals onto the rest of Europe. Stalin’s insecurities, already developed by USA’s attempts at crushing communism before WWII, were only fuelled by these factors. His desire to seek security was therefore understandable, but he did so in a way that sparked suspicion in the USA instead, perpetuating tensions between the two countries. Stalin equated territory with security, and his implementation of salami tactics was successful in creating an Eastern Europe buffer zone of satellite states, with communist governments set up in states around USSR, all loyal to the Moscow government. Stalin’s concerns over insecurity thus drove him to divide Europe into two spheres of influence, which was exactly what piqued USA’s insecurity. USA believed that it was due to the division of fascist, democratic and communist ideology in Europe that caused WWII, and it was also due to the policy of appeasement from Britain and France towards Germany that allowed Hitler to claim such a large portion of territory. The USA saw Stalin’s usage of salami tactics- the systematic conversion of Eastern European states to communism- as a repeat of what happened with Hitler pre WWII. The USA thus acted on their concerns over insecurity by implementing the Truman doctrine and the Marshall Plan- their ‘containment policy’, where they used any means short of war to contain communism within its borders. Stalin called the Marshall Plan an act of ‘dollar imperialism’ and believed it was an attempt to spread democracy and capitalism through money. Ironically, Stalin’s concerns over insecurity was caused by the US, and his response to that insecurity was what caused USA’s own concerns over insecurity, and their response to that insecurity via the TD and MP only further fuelled the USSR’s insecurity- and thus both ends were trapped in a vicious cycle which only led to heightened tensions and conflict. In conclusion, although both ideologies and concerns over insecurity were thought to be origins of cold war, it was more ideologies than concerns over insecurity that was the origin of the cold war. The concerns over insecurity could be explained by the fact that, fundamentally, the USA and USSR were very different. From the civil war in 1917, it was clear that democracy has been opposed to communism, and the communist’s internationalist ideals was what struck fear in the hearts of the democrats, who sought to convert Europe into a democratic continent because of their firm belief that if the nations prospered, there would be less chances of war. Concerns over insecurity was therefore an underlying factor of the fact that the ideologies of the two nations were mutually exclusive- more countries under communist rule meant a spread of communism, which was unacceptable to USA, and more democratic countries was an act of dollar imperialism, which was unacceptable to USSR. The origins of the cold war was therefore more of ideologies than concerns over insecurity.